A new study examines recovering predator populations along the West
Coast of the United States and in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, and
the conflicts surrounding them.
The study by scientists from NOAA Fisheries' Northwest Fisheries
Science Center and the University of Washington examines recovering
predator populations along the West Coast of the United States and in
the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, and the conflicts surrounding them.
The study was published in the journal Conservation Letters.
In the Pacific Northwest, for example, California sea lions that have increased under the Marine Mammal Protection Act have increasingly preyed on endangered salmon. Wolves reintroduced to Yellowstone in 1995 have since cut into elk herds, reducing human hunting opportunities.
"Increases in predators can be seen as successful in terms of efforts to recover depleted species, but may come at a cost to other recovery efforts or harvest of the predators' prey," said Eric Ward, a NOAA Fisheries biologist and coauthor of the paper.
The scientists describe three types of conflicts that can emerge as predators rebound under the protection of the Endangered Species Act and Marine Mammal Protection Act:
Conservation conflicts have also emerged elsewhere: On California's San Clemente Island, a threatened island fox species preys on an endangered shrike, while protected golden eagles prey on both the fox and the shrike. Also in the Pacific Northwest, protected barred owls are moving into forest habitat long important to threatened spotted owls and double-crested cormorants, like sea lions, have been targeted for culling to reduce predation on Columbia River salmon.
The scientists call for improved monitoring and modeling to better anticipate interactions between predators and prey, and assess whether steps to manage predators may be warranted. Where conflicts continue, the scientists suggest developing multi-species recovery plans that consider the tradeoffs between increasing predators and other protected species.
"Predators such as bears, wolves and whales are charismatic creatures often seen as bellwethers of ecosystem health," said Kristin Marshall, a postdoctoral researcher at NOAA Fisheries who completed graduate research in Yellowstone and lead author of the paper. "We're fortunate to have places such as Yellowstone and the Northeast Pacific where they can recover, but in protecting one species you have to be thinking ahead to account for cascading effects that may impact other species too."
The ESA and MMPA do recognize larger ecosystem needs. For instance, the first purpose of the ESA is "to provide a means whereby the ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend may be conserved," and the MMPA seeks to "maintain the health and stability of the marine ecosystem." Both NOAA Fisheries and public land managers in the Yellowstone region are increasingly pursuing ecosystem-based management with those goals in mind. Research has also found ecological benefits from the reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone.
Both the ESA and MMPA also provide safety valves by allowing limited control of recovering predators to manage their impacts under certain circumstances.
NOAA Fisheries has authorized states under the MMPA to remove sea lions known to be preying on endangered salmon, for instance. An "experimental" designation under the ESA allowed for removal of wolves that attacked livestock, although wolves are no longer listed as endangered in Montana and Idaho and are now subject to hunting.
But the scientists note that resolving conflicts by culling predators may itself have unintended consequences and will face public and legal opposition that may limit management options.
"Thirty years ago scientists predicted that increases in predator populations would cause more of these conflicts to emerge," Ward said. "We've largely seen these predictions come true, and there's no indication of these conflicts decreasing."
In the Pacific Northwest, for example, California sea lions that have increased under the Marine Mammal Protection Act have increasingly preyed on endangered salmon. Wolves reintroduced to Yellowstone in 1995 have since cut into elk herds, reducing human hunting opportunities.
"Increases in predators can be seen as successful in terms of efforts to recover depleted species, but may come at a cost to other recovery efforts or harvest of the predators' prey," said Eric Ward, a NOAA Fisheries biologist and coauthor of the paper.
The scientists describe three types of conflicts that can emerge as predators rebound under the protection of the Endangered Species Act and Marine Mammal Protection Act:
- Increased competition with humans for the same prey. For instance, sea lions eating fish also pursued by anglers and wolves preying on livestock and reducing elk numbers.
- Predators consuming protected or at-risk prey species, such as sea lions eating salmon and grizzlies consuming Yellowstone cutthroat trout.
- Protected predators competing with each other for prey. For example, sea lions consuming the same fish as killer whales, with wolves and grizzly bears also preying on the same species.
Conservation conflicts have also emerged elsewhere: On California's San Clemente Island, a threatened island fox species preys on an endangered shrike, while protected golden eagles prey on both the fox and the shrike. Also in the Pacific Northwest, protected barred owls are moving into forest habitat long important to threatened spotted owls and double-crested cormorants, like sea lions, have been targeted for culling to reduce predation on Columbia River salmon.
The scientists call for improved monitoring and modeling to better anticipate interactions between predators and prey, and assess whether steps to manage predators may be warranted. Where conflicts continue, the scientists suggest developing multi-species recovery plans that consider the tradeoffs between increasing predators and other protected species.
"Predators such as bears, wolves and whales are charismatic creatures often seen as bellwethers of ecosystem health," said Kristin Marshall, a postdoctoral researcher at NOAA Fisheries who completed graduate research in Yellowstone and lead author of the paper. "We're fortunate to have places such as Yellowstone and the Northeast Pacific where they can recover, but in protecting one species you have to be thinking ahead to account for cascading effects that may impact other species too."
The ESA and MMPA do recognize larger ecosystem needs. For instance, the first purpose of the ESA is "to provide a means whereby the ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend may be conserved," and the MMPA seeks to "maintain the health and stability of the marine ecosystem." Both NOAA Fisheries and public land managers in the Yellowstone region are increasingly pursuing ecosystem-based management with those goals in mind. Research has also found ecological benefits from the reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone.
Both the ESA and MMPA also provide safety valves by allowing limited control of recovering predators to manage their impacts under certain circumstances.
NOAA Fisheries has authorized states under the MMPA to remove sea lions known to be preying on endangered salmon, for instance. An "experimental" designation under the ESA allowed for removal of wolves that attacked livestock, although wolves are no longer listed as endangered in Montana and Idaho and are now subject to hunting.
But the scientists note that resolving conflicts by culling predators may itself have unintended consequences and will face public and legal opposition that may limit management options.
"Thirty years ago scientists predicted that increases in predator populations would cause more of these conflicts to emerge," Ward said. "We've largely seen these predictions come true, and there's no indication of these conflicts decreasing."
This story is taken from Science Daily
No comments:
Post a Comment