A new study examines recovering predator populations along the West
Coast of the United States and in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, and
the conflicts surrounding them.
The study by scientists from NOAA Fisheries' Northwest Fisheries
Science Center and the University of Washington examines recovering
predator populations along the West Coast of the United States and in
the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, and the conflicts surrounding them.
The study was published in the journal
Conservation Letters.
In the Pacific Northwest, for example, California sea lions that have
increased under the Marine Mammal Protection Act have increasingly
preyed on endangered salmon. Wolves reintroduced to Yellowstone in 1995
have since cut into elk herds, reducing human hunting opportunities.
"Increases in predators can be seen as successful in terms of efforts
to recover depleted species, but may come at a cost to other recovery
efforts or harvest of the predators' prey," said Eric Ward, a NOAA
Fisheries biologist and coauthor of the paper.
The scientists describe three types of conflicts that can emerge as
predators rebound under the protection of the Endangered Species Act and
Marine Mammal Protection Act:
- Increased competition with
humans for the same prey. For instance, sea lions eating fish also
pursued by anglers and wolves preying on livestock and reducing elk
numbers.
- Predators consuming protected or at-risk prey
species, such as sea lions eating salmon and grizzlies consuming
Yellowstone cutthroat trout.
- Protected predators competing
with each other for prey. For example, sea lions consuming the same fish
as killer whales, with wolves and grizzly bears also preying on the
same species.
Pacific Northwest waters include many such
conflicts, largely because many top predators such as sea lions,
elephant seals and several whales are increasing in number and prey upon
salmon, steelhead, rockfish and other fish protected by the Endangered
Species Act.
Conservation conflicts have also emerged elsewhere: On California's
San Clemente Island, a threatened island fox species preys on an
endangered shrike, while protected golden eagles prey on both the fox
and the shrike. Also in the Pacific Northwest, protected barred owls are
moving into forest habitat long important to threatened spotted owls
and double-crested cormorants, like sea lions, have been targeted for
culling to reduce predation on Columbia River salmon.
The scientists call for improved monitoring and modeling to better
anticipate interactions between predators and prey, and assess whether
steps to manage predators may be warranted. Where conflicts continue,
the scientists suggest developing multi-species recovery plans that
consider the tradeoffs between increasing predators and other protected
species.
"Predators such as bears, wolves and whales are charismatic creatures
often seen as bellwethers of ecosystem health," said Kristin Marshall, a
postdoctoral researcher at NOAA Fisheries who completed graduate
research in Yellowstone and lead author of the paper. "We're fortunate
to have places such as Yellowstone and the Northeast Pacific where they
can recover, but in protecting one species you have to be thinking ahead
to account for cascading effects that may impact other species too."
The ESA and MMPA do recognize larger ecosystem needs. For instance,
the first purpose of the ESA is "to provide a means whereby the
ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend
may be conserved," and the MMPA seeks to "maintain the health and
stability of the marine ecosystem." Both NOAA Fisheries and public land
managers in the Yellowstone region are increasingly pursuing
ecosystem-based management with those goals in mind. Research has also
found ecological benefits from the reintroduction of wolves in
Yellowstone.
Both the ESA and MMPA also provide safety valves by allowing limited
control of recovering predators to manage their impacts under certain
circumstances.
NOAA Fisheries has authorized states under the MMPA to remove sea
lions known to be preying on endangered salmon, for instance. An
"experimental" designation under the ESA allowed for removal of wolves
that attacked livestock, although wolves are no longer listed as
endangered in Montana and Idaho and are now subject to hunting.
But the scientists note that resolving conflicts by culling predators
may itself have unintended consequences and will face public and legal
opposition that may limit management options.
"Thirty years ago scientists predicted that increases in predator
populations would cause more of these conflicts to emerge," Ward said.
"We've largely seen these predictions come true, and there's no
indication of these conflicts decreasing."